Don't pad the paper. I've emphasized this repeatedly. A thesis should be concise and clear. I've marked all the padded sections. Don't let it happen again.
I manually screened the samples, but the process was too crude. Of the 1,406 peptides, only ten remained. I didn't see any rigorous, one-by-one screening process in your thesis, and it would have been impossible given the time frame. So I suspect these ten peptides were selected largely at random.
Searching the genes of extinct organisms for antibacterial genes was a very novel idea. If you develop it further, it could be enough for a paper in a major journal. However, it isn't very practical and is mainly a gimmick. Using a gimmick in your first paper is forgivable, but your subsequent research should return to practical applications. Don't become like those scholars who think only about publishing papers and unconsciously develop a habit of focusing on gimmicks. That's a major taboo.
The final results were neither good nor bad. Finding four sterilizing peptides among the ten was a decent ratio, but their sterilizing effects were too weak. They were better than nothing.
Despite its many shortcomings, the experimental procedure was sound. The paper was honest, with no fabrication, and you demonstrated proficiency in the complex operation of advanced instruments. Your basic knowledge was solid. My evaluation is good!
This thesis is worth a thirty-thousand-yuan bonus. The National Day holiday hasn't started yet, but since you submitted it early, it qualifies for the National Day triple bonus. That makes it a ninety-thousand-yuan bonus. It'll be transferred to your card shortly. Keep an eye out for it.
What experiment do you plan to do next? Do you have any ideas? Submit your application as soon as possible.
Song He opened the scholarship portal, found Lu