Within a short span of time, two car accidents occurred, resulting in the deaths of an entire family of three. The case was serious enough to trigger the intervention mechanism.
After the local Police Station found nothing suspicious, it sent a copy of the case to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Within the federal judicial system, there were some regulations that seemed very humane to certain people. One of them was the system of mutual challenges.
They could question cases that had already reached a conclusion, then apply for a reinvestigation and go over the case again without affecting the parties involved—or even letting them know.
Generally speaking, the Federal Bureau of Investigation was responsible for the "questions," while the local Police Station was responsible for creating the "doubts."
There was no helping it. Compared to Federal Bureau of Investigation agents, the police were actually closer to society and were easily influenced by factors outside the case itself.
Through this mechanism, the Federal Bureau of Investigation had indeed found many doubts in cases that had already been concluded, then overturned the original rulings.
This made the local Police Station and its officers feel extremely embarrassed. They had thought there was nothing wrong with the case, only for someone else to find a problem. Naturally, it looked bad for them.
In many fields, the police and Bureau of Investigation agents had overlapping powers and functions. The two sides were competitors to begin with.
Making each other look bad was something they both enjoyed.
The agent in charge of the case knew at a glance that something was wrong. Who could be so unlucky as to suffer two car accidents in a single day—no, within one or two hours—and have every member of their family killed?
And yet the people who had