As the Duncan Family and the current Federal Government were "at war," Mr. Truman's personal Campaign Office was quietly established.
In fact, during every presidential election, each party put forward more than one person to run. They might field two or three candidates, or even four or five.
Federal votes were highly scattered and disorderly. The Progressive Party and Conservative Party had relatively stable voter bases; the key was still the Swing States.
If there were only two candidates, conflict and opposition would intensify. But with more candidates, things would ease considerably.
Fair voting distributed all the votes while ensuring fairness and impartiality.
After many years of experience, they had firmly grasped the methods and experience that could maximize their chances of victory! These were truths tested by time and practice. Only what was genuinely effective would be accepted and put to use.
Of course, some people sometimes cast abstention votes. They might not understand the people on the list well enough, or they might not have a comprehensive understanding of themselves, but none of that mattered.
Businesses also played an important role in this.
Some companies offered small rewards to employees who successfully submitted ballots, thereby encouraging people to participate in voting.
Of course, this was not because the companies were particularly kindhearted. They needed to provide more "ammunition" to the forces they supported.
For example, the Progressive Party Committee had decided this year to put forward three token candidates. Among them were an actor, a lawyer, and a teacher.
When the public, because they disliked the other candidates, cast their votes for these people, those votes were regarded as "Party Stance Valid Votes."
Put simply, voters had cast their ballots for candidates with the same political stance. When these token candidates gradually fell behind and were eliminated in