If an ordinary homemaker had to sell her body to keep her family alive in a shelter, that was a warning to most ordinary families.
Then the second documentary, "Who," was the greatest warning of all to the elderly population across society!
It was warning the elderly in a way no one could have imagined.
If you were gradually becoming a burden, then you absolutely should not enter a shelter!
According to the Federal Government's definition of "the elderly," roughly thirty-five percent of society currently belonged to that group.
As a "secondary social backbone," they were mature, possessed a certain amount of wealth, social status, and influence over their families below them.
Over the course of one night, public opinion began fermenting at high speed, like dough with far too much yeast!
Almost everyone was expressing their own interpretation of the documentary.
The documentary's name, "Who," also became the focus of many people's attention.
What exactly did the name represent? What deeper meaning did it contain? People and the media were all trying to interpret it.
Many Television Stations rebroadcast the documentary during the day, and people's spirits were shaken repeatedly.
At first, it had been nothing more than a bland interview with almost no highlights. But the calmer and more ordinary this segment appeared, the more it showed how much love existed within the family.
When the elderly chose suicide to free their children, the emotional impact became all the more intense.
The ordinary was the truth.
But was the ordinary truly the truth?
No one knew. Perhaps it was, and perhaps it wasn't.
Blackstone Television Station's phones were overwhelmed with calls. The Female Reporter's face appeared on numerous signs. Of course, they were not praising her. Instead, they cursed her with all kinds of words people normally could