Blackstone Television Station even put on a special program that evening to discuss whether allowing the funds in security accounts to be withdrawn would impact the existing security system.
The Federation, and indeed the entire world, currently operated security systems tied to enterprises. Part of the public's wages was paid directly to their companies and deposited into the companies' security fund accounts.
That money was then invested in the companies' operations according to a set proportion.
The better a company performed, the more dividends its employees received, and the more money accumulated in the security fund.
The public was willing to accept this enterprise-centered security system because it offered substantial benefits.
According to several policies released by Global Communication Group, employees would ultimately receive twenty to thirty percent of their companies' operating profits.
Originally, they could not directly control this money. It would remain in the fund account and be calculated according to each individual's contribution ratio in the future.
The better the company, the more money its employees had in their accounts. But that was all it meant: since they could not withdraw it freely before, the money did not directly affect their normal lives.
Even if someone told an employee, "You have a million in your account now," it would mean nothing.
They could not withdraw it. Only after reaching retirement age would they be able to receive part of the money.
But things were completely different now. They could withdraw the money at will, which also created a new problem: if too much was withdrawn, would it affect the company's operations?
Strictly speaking, the policy adjustments released by Global Communication Group applied only to employees working for Global Communication enterprises.
Other private companies unrelated to Global Communication were not covered by the policy. However, because Global Communication