A Tiny Undercurrent [Third Update]

No one knew what Wang Qi was really thinking.

The so-called DH—decoherent histories interpretation—was not actually the core of his theory. To him, it was still merely a "practice problem" for honing his skills.

—Practicing how to turn the physical laws summarized in a Yuan Spirit Aura Universe [a universe where the aura value was always one] into theorems for this Aura Universe.

For Wang Qi, the real challenge still lay ahead.

What came later was the main event.

For instance, Bell's Inequality.

The reason he had chosen decoherent histories as the theory to contemplate when advancing to the Golden Core Stage was to declare an attitude—I was watching this field, I was thinking about this field, and I was deeply dissatisfied with the current mainstream explanations of the "observer effect." I hoped for an objective world wholly unrelated to subjective will.

If it could spark a new round of discussion over the interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, that would be even better.

Because Wang Qi's next step was Bell's Inequality—the inequality of judgment.

Bell's Inequality was a powerful mathematical inequality proposed by Bell in 1964. Under the dual assumptions of locality and realism, this theorem imposed a strict limit on the possible degree of correlation between the results of simultaneous measurements on two separated particles.

Correlation was a manifestation of cooperation—whether the two sides were astonishingly consistent or astonishingly inconsistent, both reflected a high degree of cooperation. Only when there was no obvious tendency toward either "consistency" or "inconsistency" could the degree of cooperation be considered low.

Yet Quantum Mechanics predicted that, under certain circumstances, the degree of cooperation would exceed Bell's limit. In other words, the conventional view of Quantum Mechanics required the degree of cooperation between separated systems to surpass what was logically permitted by any theory of