Actual Measurement Value

Once this place had necked down to a certain extent, it turned around, and we heard that this was a typical characteristic of plastic material failure. The value was not something inside it; rather, the cross-section kept shrinking, and once it shrank to a certain extent—what we had just discussed, tensile loading, was typical elasticity and strengthening. There was also another concept: the maximum it could withstand. This was what we called Camacho. What we mentioned when it was pulled apart was the maximum. The meanings of yield strength and tensile strength were well represented in this graph.

Then! The concept we are discussing now is called general. It must use the measured value of Kara strength, divided by the measured yield strength. That is, when using CMD divided by cf. This time we called it strength, because we believed it was the limit of bearing capacity just mentioned, but there was still a large space before it was forged. The larger this space, the better the safety reserve of the steel would be. Our code required it to be approximately what?

1.25. This was the concept of the difference; this was the meaning of this item. This item was the ratio of the measured tensile strength to the yield strength just mentioned. What did that mean? The measured value of yield strength divided by the standard value of yield strength. It was like the actual and theoretical values differing far too much. The two should be as close as possible; the closer, the better. Our code stipulated what to do with these two words: less than or equal to. It had to be qualified. The second provision stated that the ratio of all characteristic values could not exceed a certain point. After it had just been pulled, it could