Ch. 434Junkers vs. Civil Servants + Capital
Prussian leaders argued over how to respond to Austria’s military pressure and whether to trade territory for Vienna’s support. As the military faction gained influence, the debate exposed how territorial concessions would serve Junker landowners while threatening civilian officials and capitalists.
- McKet argued that Austria would avoid war because a conflict would draw in Russia and risk French intervention, while Roon insisted Austria might accept the Rhineland in exchange for German unification.
- Moltke proposed exchanging interests with Austria to secure its support or acquiescence, while McKet objected that concessions such as Silesia and Prussian Saxony would provoke public anger.
- The government and military reversed their earlier positions as the military faction gained power and favored a controlled territorial settlement.
- Prussian leaders considered moving people and property out of ceded lands, using legal noncooperation, and leaving Austria with little but empty territory.
- Junker nobles favored concessions because they needed workers for East Prussia and newly occupied lands, while civilian officials opposed them to protect capitalist interests.