Ch. 261A Little Sabotage
Summary of “A Little Sabotage”
Key Plot Points and Events
- Kino consults the Ancient One about three possible methods for dealing with the Infinity Stones:
- Obtain the Time, Space, and mysterious Ego Stones.
- Collect the six known Stones and leave the Ego Stone behind.
- Gather all seven Stones, including the Soul Stone.
- Kino rejects the third option because obtaining the Soul Stone would require sacrificing someone he loves, such as Aomei, Polaris, or possibly Gamora.
- The Ancient One warns that destroying the Ego Stone may cause the other six Stones to lose their power. The outcome is only fifty-fifty, making the first option unacceptable to Kino.
- Kino decides to pursue the second option. He currently possesses or has access to the Time, Reality, and Mind Stones, while the Space Stone remains in Asgard.
- He chooses not to interfere with Thanos’s future acquisition of the Stones, reasoning that doing so could alter events, prevent Thanos from collecting them, and force Kino to become the primary villain himself.
- Kino initially debates whether saving Gamora is wise, since she knows the route to the Soul Stone. He ultimately decides to save her, reasoning that her knowledge could still help him locate the Stone later.
- He considers bypassing the Soul Stone’s sacrifice requirement by using a young couple genuinely in love, rather than sacrificing someone personally important to him. Since he only intends to possess the Stone and not use its power, he is unconcerned about whether this method would limit its effectiveness.
- After leaving his hotel in Hong Kong, Kino sees a video of a Japanese man denying a historical massacre and provoking an angry protest. Outraged, Kino begins considering interfering in the situation before returning to New York.
Character Development
- Kino remains cautious and calculating, refusing to accept plans with uncertain odds. His obsession with achieving at least a ninety-percent success rate drives much of his decision-making.
- Despite his ruthless practicality, Kino shows emotional attachment and moral limits. He refuses to sacrifice Aomei, Polaris, or Gamora, even when doing so might make obtaining the Soul Stone easier.
- His reasoning becomes increasingly pragmatic and morally flexible when he considers abducting an unrelated couple to satisfy the Soul Stone’s conditions.
- Kino also demonstrates a preference for manipulating existing events rather than openly taking control. He deliberately allows Thanos to collect the Stones so that Kino can avoid becoming the obvious villain.
- The Ancient One serves as a source of crucial information but cannot offer Kino a completely reliable solution, emphasizing the uncertainty surrounding the Infinity Stones.
Significant Themes
- Risk versus certainty: Kino’s extreme reluctance to gamble is challenged by situations in which every option contains serious uncertainty.
- Moral compromise: Kino refuses personal sacrifice but is willing to contemplate exploiting strangers to achieve his goals.
- Control and unintended consequences: Altering events involving Asgard, Thanos, or the Infinity Stones could radically change the timeline and Kino’s role within it.
- Attachment versus ambition: Kino’s desire to protect Gamora and those he loves conflicts with his larger objective of obtaining the Stones.
- Historical injustice and responsibility: The final scene introduces Kino’s anger at denial of past atrocities and suggests that he may intervene against those distorting or suppressing history.
Character Interactions
- Kino and the Ancient One discuss the possible ways to obtain the Infinity Stones. Their conversation reveals the dangers of the Ego Stone and the Soul Stone.
- Kino mentally weighs his obligations and feelings toward Gamora, Aomei, Polaris, Star-Lord, and Thor, especially concerning Gamora’s possible sacrifice.
- His relationship with Thanos is indirect but strategically important: Kino intends to let Thanos gather the Stones rather than disrupt the established sequence of events.
- The chapter ends with Kino reacting to the protest video and preparing to take action against the Japanese denier, foreshadowing a new act of intervention or “sabotage.”