Ch. 954Hongjun's Reasons: Were the Three Pure Ones to Blame?
Key plot points and events
- Eight powerful figures—including Gungun, Houtu, and the Saints—return to the Primordial World, heralding a possible new conflict. Zhen Yuanzi senses their return.
- Taiyi reflects on why his mastery of the imperial dao law has not yet allowed him to attain the Dao. He declines to congratulate Haotian, but agrees to send Ao Yue a gift.
- The group confronts Hongjun. Laozi accuses his former master of betraying them and trying to control the world.
- Hongjun denies seeking power or fortune. He claims he gave the Three Pure Ones Saint-Felling Pills to curb their conduct and persuade them to leave the Primordial World, freeing its inhabitants from their influence.
- To support his case, Hongjun criticizes Yuanshi’s rigid laws, Tongtian’s indiscriminate recruitment of disciples, and Laozi’s calculated accumulation of Human Race fortune. His explanation unsettles the Three Pure Ones and prompts doubts among Jieyin, Zhunti, and Nuwa.
- Gungun rejects Hongjun’s defense as self-serving: if Hongjun wanted the Three Pure Ones to change, he could have ordered them to do so rather than secretly poisoning them. He urges everyone to attack, then charges in himself.
Character developments and interactions
- Taiyi remains preoccupied with his stalled progress toward the Dao, while maintaining a hard boundary between the Demon Race and the Ancestral Bear.
- Hongjun presents himself as acting for the world’s living beings, but his claims leave the others suspicious. He confronts each of the Three Pure Ones with specific accusations.
- Laozi, Yuanshi, and Tongtian react differently to Hongjun’s criticisms: Laozi grows slightly uncomfortable, Yuanshi’s composure barely shifts, and Tongtian looks awkward.
- Gungun cuts through the debate with blunt skepticism and impulsive action. He even uses Jieyin and Zhunti as shields before pushing them toward Hongjun, turning the confrontation into a fight.
Significant themes
- Power versus public interest: Hongjun claims his actions served ordinary beings rather than his own authority, but others question whether that justification excuses coercion.
- Manipulation and trust: The Saints must weigh Hongjun’s accusations against their knowledge of his secretive methods.
- Religious authority and responsibility: Hongjun’s critique raises questions about how the Three Pure Ones used their influence, laws, disciples, and access to fortune.
- Action versus debate: Gungun’s response highlights the group’s distrust and impatience with political explanations: instead of continuing to argue, he chooses to fight.