Zhang Yingying was Feng Qian's colleague.
Both were judges, but their philosophies on adjudication differed.
Zhang Yingying believed everything had to be based on facts, with absolutely no wrongful judgments.
By comparison, Feng Qian was far more subjective.
In other words, she ruled according to her own subjective views rather than the facts. Although her subjective judgment of right and wrong was indeed intended to help the good side,
ruling on that basis was highly likely to produce wrongful judgments in certain circumstances.
After Jiang Hetao spoke, Zhang Yingying and Feng Qian both remained silent and said nothing more.
Time passed quickly.
Adjournment ended.
After the court clerk announced that the hearing would resume, the judicial personnel took their seats on the bench again.
Bang!
Presiding Judge Jiang Hetao struck the gavel.
"Adjournment is over. The hearing will continue."
Bang!
"Before the recess, both parties made detailed statements regarding the case."
"The parties dispute whether the defendant, Wang Mingxuan, anticipated or foresaw that Lin Xiu would jump out of the vehicle."
"They dispute whether Wang Mingxuan should be found guilty of negligent homicide."
"This court summarizes the points in dispute as follows:"
"First: after seeing Lin Xiu lean her body out of the window, did Wang Mingxuan foresee or anticipate that she would jump out?"
"Second: did Wang Mingxuan's braking mean that he had already foreseen that Lin Xiu would jump out, and was there a causal relationship between the two?"
"Third: given that Wang Mingxuan already knew Lin Xiu was frightened, did he bear criminal responsibility for her jumping out of the vehicle?"
"Do either of the parties have any comments or objections regarding these three questions summarized by the collegial panel?"
This summary-
Jiang Hetao could be said to have summed it up very thoroughly.
There were virtually