There was little left to challenge in the evidence for this case.
The evidence of the killing existed.
The factual basis was complete, and the chain of evidence was conclusive.
Although there had been no cameras during the incident, the facts established through statements, the murder weapon, and other evidence could not be disputed.
As for Su Bai's request to reject the passion crime argument.
Ye Hua naturally knew how to counter it.
But as a first-rate lawyer, he knew very well that the other side could easily refute his counterargument.
At the same time, judging from the previous first instance ruling.
The main factors behind the finding of a passion crime had been Wu Xingguo's statement, his emotional state, and the angle of the sophistry.
The circumstances at the time had been explained through Wu Xingguo's statement and his subjective intent.
The final point, approaching it from the angle of the defense argument, was the most important.
This method of argument would work against an ordinary lawyer.
But it would only work against an ordinary lawyer.
After all, a lawyer's ability to react on the spot was important.
But this kind of argument would not work against Su Bai.
Why?
Because he had looked into Su Bai, a well-known criminal lawyer in the Southern Capital, and knew it would be all too easy for him to refute this kind of defense.
His opponent was thoroughly familiar with all kinds of criminal statutes and could apply them in court.
What was more.
Why had the Sudu High Court agreed to hear Wu Guoxing's case again?
Precisely because it had determined that there had been certain omissions and problems in the first instance ruling.
Otherwise, the High Court would not have accepted the appeal for a second instance hearing.
As Wu