Point of view, supervision? Nothing to fear!
Su Bai slammed the table and repeatedly challenged Jiang Feng, who sat at the judges' bench.
Jiang Feng had shown far too strong a bias in this case.
It completely defied the reasonableness required of a judgment and the relevant legal provisions governing fair and impartial rulings.
This ruling was not merely unreasonable!
If the trial had been public, it would have sent shock waves through the legal community!
Why was that?
Generally speaking, in the legal community, presiding judges made their rulings with reference to defense counsel's arguments.
If those arguments complied with the law, a judgment could be made accordingly.
Su Bai had handled many cases, whether civil, administrative, or criminal.
He had dealt with criminal cases of all kinds, large and small.
How should he put it? Rulings based on statutory circumstances did exist.
But not rulings that still relied on statutory circumstances after he had produced the relevant evidence.
Now the presiding judge was finding Xia Mingyuan guilty based on statutory circumstances.
What statutory circumstances?
Clearly, he wanted to find Xia Mingyuan guilty.
Jiang Feng's ruling just now was visibly problematic.
First, Jiang Feng had not admitted what Su Bai had just submitted: statements from the school's students and teachers that indirectly confirmed the testimony of Wu Yan and the other victims was false.
This was a crucial piece of evidence.
Although it had not yet been authenticated.
It could certainly be authenticated after the hearing, before a determination was made as to whether Xia Mingyuan was guilty.
Rejecting it outright and finding that Xia Mingyuan had molested and harassed Wu Yan and the other victims.
Was equivalent to failing to exclude illegal evidence.
What did that mean...
It meant that Su Bai had presented circumstances suggesting that Wu