Accusing the Accusing Party.
In Su Bai's rebuttal, he had chiefly expressed just one point-
Whether the circumstances were serious depended on what harm had been caused.
What specific form had that harm taken?
There was another point: did potential harm count as grounds for finding the circumstances serious?
As for that last point, it clearly did not hold up legally.
What was potential harm?
It was a future possibility, not an existing objective fact.
If you talked about potential here, then anything could happen in the future. How could you guarantee that other possibilities did not exist?
Therefore, claims unsupported by objective facts were not permitted, recognized, or accepted in law.
Furthermore.
What Su Bai had just explained was already very clear.
The physical harm from taking generic copies could completely overshadow their potential harm.
Moreover, there had been neither widespread cases nor any individual case of serious illness caused by taking the generic copies.
How could the circumstances be deemed serious?
On what grounds could they be deemed serious?
There was simply no factual basis for such a finding.
The first-instance ruling had initially been made on the premise of a profit motive.
Under those circumstances, finding the circumstances serious was perfectly normal.
But now that premise had been rejected in the second instance, the circumstances could not be deemed serious from that standpoint.
Overall... there shouldn't be much of a problem.
Su Bai repeated those words silently to himself.
After all parties had finished presenting their respective views.
At the Judges' Bench, Duan Qingshui, serving as Presiding Judge, took the evidence submitted by the Accusing Party and the Prosecution from the documents before him.
Judging by the documents.
None of the materials currently submitted by the Prosecution and the Accusing Party showed any cases of serious