Why say that the case lead Wang Kexin had found involved a judge being sent to prison?
Because the party involved in this case lead had originally been a presiding judge.
According to the description in the case lead,
the circumstances of this case were that a presiding judge at a certain court, while hearing a civil case,
had not ruled in accordance with instructions passed down from above.
He had suffered retaliation.
As a result of that retaliation, this presiding judge had been accused of perverting the law in judgment despite having ruled correctly.
He had ultimately been sentenced to six months of fixed-term imprisonment and stripped of his public office.
Based on the detailed description in the case lead, Xu Xiang searched online for the specific course of events and the relevant first-instance judgment document.
The outcome of this case could very well have a tremendous impact on the judicial personnel who had handed down the ruling at the time.
"But this presiding judge who was convicted insisted that his ruling wasn't wrong. He refused to admit fault and firmly refused to change his ruling!"
"Now this presiding judge has paid the price for his stubbornness and for upholding justice. He was sentenced to several months, I think."
There were thousands of replies beneath this anonymous user's comment.
"It was posted on independent media accounts, but that didn't do any good either."
"So they asked our local Intermediate People's Court to deal with this matter strictly."
Thus, under normal circumstances, the contents of a judgment document were all explained in accordance with the outcome.
"The plaintiff is a relative of mine. That's why I know so much."
"The plaintiff's family are just ordinary people. They feel very guilty toward this presiding judge over this, but there's nothing they