Ch. 423A trial reversal: was Jordan's name "Jordan"?
At Jordan's trial, Su Bai argued that public recognition established Jordan's right to his name in China, while Zhang Yuan argued that the right belonged only to Chinese citizens. The judges deliberated and leaned toward the plaintiff's position, leaving the court's ruling pending.
- Su Bai argued that Chinese media and the public recognized Jordan by that name, giving him a right to it under the law's definition of an identifying characteristic.
- Zhang Yuan countered that Jordan was not a Chinese citizen and therefore could not hold the right of name in China, but offered no legal interpretation beyond Article 99 of the General Principles of Civil Law.
- Liang Youcheng adjourned the trial for the collegial panel to deliberate, leaving Su Bai cautiously hopeful and Zhang Yuan and Xiao Youzhi worried.
- Lin Hai feared the judges might accept the plaintiff's argument, while Xu Fei mistakenly believed the recess meant Jordan Sports Co., Ltd. had won.
- In deliberations, Zhang Shulin, Feng Feng, and Liang Youcheng agreed that public recognition supported Jordan's position and that the defendant's conduct should not be tolerated.