Helen was still somewhat puzzled. In her impression, Doctor Schiller simply did not know how to endure things. He always looked calm on the surface, but behind the scenes, he never stopped stirring things up.
It was never "endure it for now, then act," but rather, "the problem had been solved before it even appeared."
So Helen was rather curious. How could the difference be so great when they were clearly the same person?
Jason said that was indeed the case.
"And if Doctor Schiller solved a problem before it happened, then even if the process was a little dangerous, the ending would definitely be happy for everyone."
"But when Professor Schiller acted after reaching the end of his patience, it wasn't to solve the problem. He was merely venting his dissatisfaction. At that point, whoever ran into him was unlucky, and he didn't care what the problem ultimately turned into."
"You could compare it like this: an apple got worms. Doctor Schiller would dig them out while they were still eggs. Not only would he save the apple, but he could also use the hatched worms elsewhere, killing two birds with one stone."
"But Professor Schiller wouldn't care while the worms were still hiding under the peel. Yet once they crawled out and became unbearable, he would stab the apple."
"After being stabbed, the apple would rot faster, and the worms inside would starve to death without food. In a sense, that did eliminate the worms, but he wouldn't care how the apple felt."
"And Schiller didn't stab the apple because he had foreseen that its rot would starve the worms. It was purely because he felt like killing."
After hearing Jason's explanation, Helen fell silent. She had never expected Doctor Schiller, who seemed more emotionally expressive, to be