Recaps

Lomachi argued that the Third Fleet should seize Qatar and use its natural deep-water harbors to build major naval bases. He concluded that Qatar’s poverty and Britain’s lack of attention made the plan feasible, leaving the fleet’s proposed expansion under consideration.

• Lomachi supported Qatar as a headquarters location because its harbors could accommodate battleships and other large warships.
• Plato worried that sending troops into Qatar could provoke British suspicion and lead to conflict.
• Lomachi described Qatar’s small population and dependence on herding, fishing, pearling, and piracy, explaining that piracy had declined and artificial pearls threatened its remaining livelihood.
• Lomachi argued that Britain had little reason or capacity to defend Qatar and that no other Persian Gulf power was likely to intervene.
• Lomachi proposed using Qatar to build two or three military ports for the Third Fleet’s future expansion.

Lomachi and Plato proposed taking Qatar to expand the Third Fleet’s bases and strength, and Ernst approved the plan after discussing it with Friedrich. The story left East Africa preparing to seize Qatar with troops from the Northern Bay Territory and build its Persian Gulf presence around the territory.

• Lomachi argued that Qatar and Gwadar Port could provide bases for expanding the Third Fleet and accommodating battleships.
• Plato supported the proposal, saying the Third Fleet’s weak equipment and harsh station made the move its last chance to improve its standing.
• Lomachi and Plato sent their plans to the mainland after organizing proposed combat and construction operations.
• Ernst and Friedrich agreed that East African troops in the Northern Bay Territory should lead the operation, limiting the navy’s role to avoid alarming Britain.
• Ernst formally approved the takeover of Qatar and the Third Fleet’s plan to establish a larger Persian Gulf presence centered there.

East African brigade commander Seferel received Sayyid’s intelligence on Qatar and learned that its sparse, nomadic population and small tribes would make conquest easy. Seferel concluded that a battalion could take the peninsula, though the entire brigade had already been mobilized.

• Sayyid described Qatar’s scattered coastal settlements, nomadic tribes, and the Al Thani family’s seat as its largest center.
• Sayyid explained that Jassim and the Al Thani family had gained control of Qatar by exploiting tensions between the Ottoman Empire and the British.
• Sayyid told Seferel that Qatar’s tribes were so small that the main challenge would be locating them across the peninsula.
• Seferel said a company could subdue the Al Thani family and a battalion could conquer Qatar, then decided to treat the brigade’s campaign as a trip.

On October 6, 1918, East Africa invaded Qatar and took Bida in less than a day without a battle. Brigadier Seferel questioned Jassim about the surrender, and Jassim offered to leave Qatar with his family if East Africa let them go safely.

• Brigadier Seferel and the 37th Brigade’s officers dismissed Qatar as too small and weak to warrant serious military effort.
• East Africa declared war on Qatar without warning, and the 37th Brigade captured Bida as tribes across the country surrendered.
• Seferel met Jassim, who explained that the Al Thani family ruled only its own tribe and had no power to unite Qatar’s other tribes.
• Seferel asked whether Jassim would accept being sent elsewhere, and Jassim agreed on behalf of his family while asking for safe passage out of Qatar.
• Jassim submitted because he feared East Africa’s reputation for cruelty and hoped to preserve his family’s survival.

Seferel questioned Jassim about where the Al Thani family would seek refuge, then recommended Oman as a destination. Ernst instead ordered the family and Qataris exiled to Batavia, and more than 13,400 Qataris boarded ships there in late 1918.

• Jassim told Seferel that the Al Thani family could seek refuge with the Ottoman Empire, Oman, the Hashemites, or the House of Saud.
• Seferel advised Jassim to choose Oman and promised to recommend the family to East Africa's government.
• Jassim agreed to cooperate with East Africa and hand over Qatar if his family and tribe could leave safely.
• Three days later, Seferel sent his recommendation to the homeland, and Ernst ordered the Qataris sent to Batavia rather than the Persian Gulf.
• In late 1918, more than 13,400 Qataris from across Qatar boarded ships in Doha bound for Batavia.

East Africa transported Qatar’s entire population to Batavia, where Dutch officials received them and considered using some as colonial soldiers. The Qataris arrived relieved by the city’s prosperity, while East Africa continued fortifying Sangiang Island in the Sunda Strait.

• East African troops gathered Qataris from across the country and shipped them from Doha without anyone dying in the invasion.
• An East African captain showed the crew and Qataris the construction underway on Sangiang Island, including planned forts and an airport.
• The immigrant ship reached Batavia, and the Qataris welcomed the prospect of starting new lives in the prosperous city.
• Dutch officials received the Qataris and the governor planned to enlist some in the Colonial Army to suppress local resistance.

The Qataris arrived in Batavia and welcomed the prospect of a greener, more prosperous life away from war. Meanwhile, East Africa planned to turn the emptied Qatar Peninsula into a strategic military stronghold in the Persian Gulf, centered on new naval ports and a permanent army presence.

• Melchior told Governor Van der Beck that the Qataris could be settled anywhere in the Dutch East Indies as long as their basic living conditions were guaranteed.
• Van der Beck planned to settle the Qataris on Batavia's outskirts, while Jassim praised migration as an escape from Qatar's harsh conditions and the Persian Gulf war.
• East Africa assigned the 37th Brigade to remain in Qatar and planned a major military port at Doha because Bida's shallow harbor could not accommodate large vessels.
• The Third Fleet proposed two additional ports on Qatar's northern and eastern coasts, despite the need to bring in mainland engineers and dredge silted bays.
• Ernst chose to keep Qatar separate from the Northern Bay Territory and envisioned it as East Africa's future land, sea, and air military base in the Persian Gulf.

East Africa’s annexation of Qatar strengthened its ability to challenge Britain and Russia in the Persian Gulf as the world war continued into 1919. In Rhine City, Ernst ordered a nationwide census and economic review, leaving officials anxious about scrutiny of past misconduct.

• East Africa annexed Qatar without resistance after foreign personnel had left the peninsula, gaining a strategic position for its navy in the Persian Gulf.
• The Central Powers advanced in the Balkans and Middle East, reopening the Berlin-to-Baghdad railway and shifting the southern war’s focus toward the Persian Gulf and Red Sea coasts.
• As 1919 began, the East African government gathered population, industrial, and economic data ahead of the 1920 milestone.
• Ernst ordered officials to ensure accurate statistics, with central-government spot checks and consequences for falsification.
• Ernst called for public proposals and reviews of past economic policy, including investigations into negligent officials, corruption, harmful competition, and monopolies.
• East African officials grew tense as Ernst’s scrutiny raised the prospect that serious past misconduct would be exposed and punished.

East Africa’s census revealed a preliminary population of 163 million, making it the world’s third-most populous nation, while officials explained that unregistered migrants meant its urban population was substantially higher than household records showed. Ernst accepted an estimated urbanization rate above 40 percent as the census continued toward final figures.

• Fonte and Rhine investigated Amphurste Village and found that 2,097 of its 3,208 registered residents were currently living there, with many others working or residing elsewhere.
• Fonte, Rhine, and local officials spent several days tracking residents and checking births, deaths, and household records, illustrating the difficulty of conducting the census.
• Langfurt and Wolnitz reported to Ernst that preliminary household registration figures put East Africa’s population at 163 million, including 55.4 million registered urban residents.
• Officials explained that East Africa had surpassed Russia to become the world’s third-most populous nation, behind the Far East Empire and Britain, while excluding colonial populations from the tally.
• Langfurt told Ernst that migrants with rural registrations inflated the actual urban population, which officials estimated could exceed 40 percent of the national population.

Langfurt described East Africa’s population distribution and its strategy of developing five economic and industrial centers through a unified transportation network. Ernst declared East Africa a nascent industrial power while warning officials that catching up with the established great powers would become increasingly difficult.

• Langfurt outlined where East Africa’s population and industrial workers were concentrated and explained the country’s north-south development imbalance.
• Langfurt presented the Three Big, Two Small plan, which linked five economic regions through railways, roads, and waterways.
• The chapter explained how sparse populations and completed transport networks supported living standards in East Africa’s remote northern regions.
• Preliminary 1918 population data showed East Africa had reached about forty percent urbanization, surpassing the era’s global average and the usual threshold for developed countries.
• Ernst told government officials that East Africa had become a nascent industrial power, but its industrial quality and urbanization still lagged behind Britain, Germany, the United States, and France.

Will reported that East Africa had built more than 302,700 kilometers of railway by 1918 and was shifting from rapid expansion toward electrification, modernization, and efficient use of its network. The chapter explained that the earlier construction boom depended on enslaved Black labor, while East Africa’s current railway strategy focused on mechanization and high-quality development.

• Will reported that East Africa ranked second worldwide in railway mileage and led in electrified railways.
• The chapter described how East Africa’s earlier railway expansion relied on forced labor and the exploitation of Black slaves, whose records the government later destroyed or falsified.
• Will said railway policy had moved away from blind expansion toward mechanization, improved worker safety, and higher-quality development.
• The Ministry of Railways promoted engineering machinery and resource optimization to offset East Africa’s higher labor costs.
• The chapter contrasted railway use in East Africa with inefficient or insufficient networks elsewhere and concluded that the country’s 310,000 kilometers of rail had reached its intended scale.

In March 1919, East African and Chilean officials met in Luanda to discuss restoring trade through the Strait of Magellan after the Panama Canal had reduced its importance. The talks ended with Chile considering East Africa’s request for a foothold in the strait, while both sides turned to expanding trade in copper ore and nitrate.

• The chapter described East Africa’s dependence on railways for economic development, national defense, and control over its territory.
• Luanda and Punta Arenas became friendly cities, and Reni welcomed Ricaldo at a banquet celebrating East African-Chilean cooperation.
• Reni and Ricaldo discussed how the Panama Canal had damaged shipping through the Strait of Magellan and how reopening the route could strengthen trade between their countries.
• Reni asked Chile to provide East Africa with a safe harbor and maintenance base in the strait, but Ricaldo said his government would need to study the territorial request.
• Reni offered to rent a foothold if Chile agreed, then proposed expanding trade routes for Chilean copper ore and nitrate.

East Africa and Chile discussed expanding economic cooperation and improving navigation through the Strait of Magellan. Chile remained wary of East African intentions, but Rennie promised that practical cooperation would deepen mutual trust.

• Foreign Minister Ricaldo proposed closer trade between Chile and East Africa and plans to develop Punta Arenas as a hub for cooperation.
• Rennie offered East African help upgrading Punta Arenas’s port and surveying the Strait of Magellan’s terrain, weather, and waters.
• Rennie proposed weather-monitoring stations, navigation aids, refuge ports, and a trained pilotage system to make the strait safer for ships.
• East Africa sought detailed knowledge of the strait to support its trade and naval routes between the Atlantic and Pacific, while Chile restricted East African naval access over security concerns.
• Rennie said economic development would strengthen mutual trust and affirmed East Africa’s support for Chile’s interests in Central and South America.

Luanda mayor Horn Grem and Punta Arenas mayor Baldivia praised each other while discussing closer economic ties between their cities. They agreed that building a trade route linking East Africa, Luanda, Punta Arenas, and Chile could benefit both cities, though the national governments remained cautious about their relationship.

• Horn Grem told Baldivia that Luanda ranked among the leading cities on the South Atlantic coast.
• Baldivia praised Luanda’s growth and said he dreamed of living in the prosperous city.
• Horn Grem praised Punta Arenas for developing despite its harsh climate and remote location.
• Baldivia credited Punta Arenas’s growth to its position on the Strait of Magellan shipping route and noted its modest size.
• Horn Grem proposed that Luanda and Punta Arenas deepen economic and industrial cooperation by developing a trade route between East Africa and Chile.

East African leaders planned to use trade with Chile to secure access through the Strait of Magellan while assessing the shifting war in the Middle East and Russia. As the Russian Labor Party neared victory, Ernst concluded that East Africa could no longer wait to intervene in the European war.

• Horn Grem and Baldivia discussed commercial exchanges that would expand Luanda City's influence in Punta Arenas while bringing Chilean exports to East Africa.
• Pripriate, Cristiano, and Ernst agreed that East Africa needed a stable Atlantic-to-Pacific route through the Strait of Magellan and should cultivate Chile while keeping Argentina and the Drake Passage in view.
• Pripriate and Cristiano reported that the Central Powers were gaining ground in the Middle East as Britain and the Entente focused on western Europe.
• Cristiano said the Russian Labor Party controlled most of European Russia, while Japan supported its opponents in the Far East, and predicted the civil war could end within months.
• Ernst warned that the Russian Labor Party's likely victory could threaten Europe and decided East Africa could no longer delay intervening in the war.

Belton and Green read East Africa’s first public peace initiative, which urged the belligerents to end the World War and blamed Jewish influence for the conflict. The article left Belton shaken by the war’s scale, while the chapter explained East Africa’s political motives for casting Jews as a scapegoat.

• Green offered Belton a Rhine News Agency paper and explained that it was an official East African newspaper, not a German one.
• Belton suspected East Africa might join the Central Powers, but Green pointed to its call for the war to end.
• Belton read East Africa’s peace initiative, which described the conflict as a World War and cited its vast reach, casualties, and suffering.
• Belton and Green agreed that the figures made the war’s cost horrifying, while discussing the article’s claims about Jewish influence.
• The chapter explained that East Africa blamed Jews to give European governments a pretext for ending the war and preserving the old aristocratic order.

East Africa launched a European diplomatic and propaganda campaign to secure an armistice, arguing that the war threatened Germany and the continent with unrest. Wilhelm II remained undecided but agreed to consider peace if Britain and France could also be persuaded.

• East Africa began lobbying European governments for an armistice and blamed the war’s devastation on competing capital groups, especially Jewish capital.
• Ambassador Kobelin urged Wilhelm II to end the war, warning that German exhaustion and Labor Party activity could threaten the Empire.
• Kobelin proposed blaming the Jews and the Labor Party for Germany’s troubles to redirect public anger and ease the government’s postwar burden.
• Wilhelm II considered an armistice but told Kobelin that Britain and France had to be persuaded first.
• Germany’s leaders debated whether to accept an armistice as East African diplomats and the National Security Bureau spread anti-war propaganda across Europe.

East Africa's ambassador Lipovitz persuaded French leaders that the war threatened France's population and future, and Clemenceau and Marshal Pétain backed seeking peace negotiations. France agreed to pursue talks, leaving Lipovitz to secure German cooperation and encourage sincere terms.

• Lipovitz warned French officials that casualties and continued fighting could leave France unable to remain a great power.
• Clemenceau accepted that the war was destroying France's future, while Joffre questioned whether France would be surrendering to Germany.
• Marshal Pétain supported Clemenceau and argued that France should withdraw from the war before its national strength was ruined.
• France's leaders decided to seek peace negotiations, and Clemenceau asked Lipovitz to persuade Germany to show sincerity.
• Lipovitz agreed and invoked the threat of the Labor Parties as a reason for European nations to end the war.

East Africa intensified its European propaganda campaign to pressure Germany and Britain into peace, exploiting anti-war and anti-Semitic sentiment. The campaign stirred unrest across Britain and helped persuade European governments to begin preliminary negotiations.

• Friel told Ernst that France, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and smaller European nations supported ending the war, while Germany and Britain remained reluctant.
• Ernst ordered officials to direct public anger away from European governments and toward Jews and the Labor Party, while preventing a revolutionary red tide.
• Ernst instructed East African intelligence agencies to restrain their operations in Germany and increase pressure on Britain.
• Balerton rejected radio and leaflet campaigns in Edinburgh and used small newspapers to spread anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and anti-war rhetoric.
• Rumors spread through Edinburgh and other British cities, fueling anti-Semitism and renewed opposition to the war.
• European governments came under public pressure and became willing to begin preliminary peace negotiations.

East African officials reviewed the Empire’s 1918 energy production and outlined plans to diversify supplies, improve efficiency, and strengthen energy security. The chapter ended with ministries agreeing to expand mechanization, oil exploration, hydropower, and fuel pipelines.

• East African and Dutch mediators urged European representatives to negotiate calmly, but the belligerents continued arguing and repeatedly interrupted their first meeting.
• Minister Mette reported that East Africa produced over 230 million tons of coal in 1918, while its proven reserves reached 60 billion tons and imports and colonial production supplemented domestic supply.
• Mette described coal’s continuing role in industry and the government’s plans to advance coal chemicals and coal-to-oil research.
• Mette reported that East Africa produced over 300 million barrels of refined petroleum in 1918 and explained how petroleum supported transport, automobiles, and petrochemicals.
• Mette stated that hydropower supplied over 30 percent of East Africa’s electricity and reduced reliance on fossil fuels.
• Mette proposed mechanizing coal mines, searching for domestic and overseas oilfields, expanding water projects, and building large fuel pipeline networks.

In July 1919, officials from Bohemia Province visited Mbeya city to study how it had transformed its heavy-industrial economy while improving its environment. Mayor Ikuti and Mayor Valenc returned their attention to the risks facing resource-dependent cities such as Gweru and the need to build sustainable industries.

• Mayor Ikuti praised Mbeya city’s urban planning and environmental quality, while acknowledging that Harare city had much to learn despite its larger population.
• Mayor Valenc explained that Mbeya city benefited from its early development, established industries, and transportation position, and said Bohemia Province wanted to learn from its industrial transformation.
• Ikuti described the pollution and heavy-industry dependence affecting Harare city, while Valenc warned that Gweru relied too heavily on mining and metal smelting.
• Ikuti warned that towns unable to find sustainable industries could be eliminated during Bohemia Province’s restructuring and urged cities to avoid a cycle of closures and population loss.
• Valenc resolved to reorganize Gweru’s resources, preserve viable enterprises and public institutions, and seek policies that would support ordinary businesses and emerging industries.

Ernst warned East African officials that wartime industrial expansion and Europe’s postwar debts could lead to a global economic crisis after 1925. He called for restructuring industry, tightening financial and market oversight, and building protections for East Africa’s economy before the crisis arrived.

• Ernst told government officials that wartime demand had fueled industrial overcapacity and that Europe’s postwar recovery could trigger a severe global downturn.
• Hans Leighton warned that Europe’s debts created risks for East African trade, and Ernst urged officials to limit European debt exposure and seek hard currency, equipment, or technology in payment.
• Ernst called for a gradual shift toward economic conservatism, including tariff protections and policies to stabilize domestic industry and prepare for a crisis.
• Ernst used steel production to illustrate overcapacity and urged the government to close inefficient mills while supporting innovative enterprises and emerging industries.
• Ernst called for stronger financial supervision, market regulation, and action against private businesses that undermined market rules.

In October 1919, East African Foreign Minister Freer returned to The Hague to mediate a second peace conference between Britain, France, Germany, and Austria. He argued that the battlefield stalemate and rising unrest made continuing the war dangerous, leaving the great powers to confront the need for negotiations.

• Freer arrived in the Netherlands and discussed peace and closer cooperation with Dutch Prime Minister Keppel.
• Representatives of Britain, France, Germany, and Austria gathered for a secret conference, while the United States and Ottoman Empire remained excluded.
• Freer urged the delegates to calm their tempers and warned that the war would bring more slaughter and worsen domestic unrest.
• Freer described how the Central Powers and Entente Powers had offset each other's gains, leaving the war deadlocked and without a clear end.

Minister Friel’s peace proposal gained support, but the delegates argued over who bore responsibility for the war and what Serbia should lose. Britain negotiated to preserve Serbia while offering territorial concessions and reparations to the Austro-Hungarian Empire and Bulgaria.

• Mautendorf supported Friel’s proposal to end the war, while Fromm accused the Austro-Hungarian Empire of triggering it by attacking Serbia.
• Mautendorf retorted that Britain had backed Serbia and challenged Fromm over Scotland, Ireland, and Wales; Keppel and Friel redirected the discussion.
• Friel blamed Serbia’s militarism and Greater Serbia ambitions for the war, while acknowledging that Russia had backed it.
• Fromm proposed recognizing Austro-Hungarian sovereignty over Bosnia and having Serbia pay reparations, cede territory, and surrender war criminals.
• Mautendorf demanded compensation for Bulgaria as well, and Fromm agreed that Bulgaria could reclaim lands lost in the previous Balkan Wars.

At the peace conference, Britain, France, Germany, and Austria-Hungary negotiated territorial settlements in Eastern Europe and agreed on naval disarmament. East Africa accepted limits on its navy provided the United States and Japan were also bound, and the conference moved toward a postwar order shaped by the great powers.

• Frier declared the Serbian issue resolved, and the powers began bargaining over the lands and interests of weaker nations.
• Fromm and Bettmann agreed that Germany would gain territory east of Warsaw while Poland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania became independent states.
• Fromm proposed an independent Ukraine and reparations for Austria-Hungary, while Moldova was divided among Austria-Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria.
• Germany and France agreed to keep troops out of the Lorraine and Alsace border regions after the armistice.
• Fromm called for naval reductions and proposed that no other country's fleet exceed Britain's Royal Navy.
• Frier accepted naval limits on condition that the United States and Japan also comply and that East Africa retain at least the world's third-largest navy.