Controversy

In fact, based on Zhou Ming's life experience and his long experiences in the instances, he had formed his own conclusions about good people and bad people.

In life, no matter what kind of society it was, roughly one out of every ten people would be a "good person," and one would be a "bad person" (not bad in the strict sense, but leaning toward bad).

The other eight were ordinary people with both good and bad sides.

Out of every hundred people, there would probably be one Great Good Person praised by everyone, and one True Bad Egg who embarked on the path of crime. The other ninety-eight would be neither good enough to selflessly devote themselves nor bad enough to break the law and commit crimes.

In short, no matter the society, the chances of "good people" and "bad people" appearing were roughly equal, about one to one.

Of course, this ratio was not fixed. It changed dynamically according to the social climate and the intensity of crackdowns on crime.

In an era of material abundance, peace and stability, low crime rates, and strong official promotion of social righteousness, there would be more good people and fewer bad people.

In an era of material scarcity, war and chaos, rampant crime, and weak official rule, there would be far fewer good people and far more bad people.

Sometimes, under pressure from their environment, good people had no choice but to do bad things in order to survive... even if they possessed kind hearts.

But overall, there were certainly far more people who aspired to be good than those who aspired to be bad... Thus, to a certain extent, the saying "there are still more good people than bad people" held true. After all, humans were social animals, and safeguarding