"Please rate Instructor Buleida's study course—"
"Fail, Pass, Good, Excellent"
According to the introduction, the rating had two purposes. First, it affected an instructor's weekly salary; second, it was closely tied to permission applications.
There was no need to elaborate on the weekly salary. If an instructor received "Fail" teaching ratings multiple times during superior evaluations, part of their weekly salary might be deducted.
Beyond that, ratings were also related to permission advancement.
For instance, Buleida was currently considered an ordinary instructor and held Level 4 permissions. If she wanted to apply for Level 5 permissions—Senior Instructor—she needed to receive a large number of "Excellent" ratings.
Among them, an excellent rating from a high-permission holder could count for several ordinary ones.
For example, Angel held the highest Level 9 permissions. If he gave Buleida an excellent rating, then a single excellent rating would be enough for Buleida to reach the threshold for advancement.
In other words, once Buleida completed her Level 4 exclusive task, she could directly apply for Level 5 permissions without being bottlenecked by her level at all.
That was the value of a rating from a high-permission holder.
After roughly understanding the situation, Angel did not hesitate and directly gave Buleida an "Excellent."
Judging solely by teaching quality, Buleida might not necessarily have deserved an excellent rating. But taking all the outside factors into account—such as Buleida's unhesitating support for Angel's work—he naturally gave her the highest rating.
Once he had made the rating, the third stage of the task was considered successfully completed.
Angel looked at the task panel, where the fourth stage had appeared as well.
``` "You have completed the third stage of the principal-exclusive task."
"You have obtained management configuration permissions."
"You have accepted the fourth stage of the principal-exclusive task—Establish the Academy