Ch. 81An irresistible bargaining chip
Key plot points and events
- Naruto is brought to the Uchiha clan head’s home, where Mikoto welcomes him after learning he is Kushina’s son. Sasuke is around his age, and the two play together.
- Shisui explains that the Third Hokage has placed ANBU guards on Naruto and is monitoring events. Naruto’s arrival has stirred the Uchiha Hardliners.
- Madara asks Shisui to take him to the Hardliners’ gathering. Shisui warns that the Hokage will witness the encounter—and that Madara’s choice could make his position clear.
- The Hokage and senior advisors watch through crystal balls. Madara’s decision to confront the Hardliners reassures the Hokage, though the advisors remain cautious.
- At the gathering, Fugaku challenges the Hardliners’ plans for an uprising, arguing that life in Konoha is improving and rebellion would endanger the clan. Someone counters by invoking Itachi’s favor with Shinhiko Kōzuki.
Character developments and interactions
- Madara decisively chooses Naruto’s future value over the Hardliners, treating Naruto’s arrival as an opportunity to secure his trust. His calm resolve also hides an unsettling excitement.
- Shisui serves as a link between the Hokage’s surveillance and the Uchiha household, and recognizes the significance of Madara’s decision.
- Fugaku openly argues for peace and continued prosperity, putting him at odds with the Hardliners.
- The Third Hokage uses Naruto’s placement with Mikoto both as a gesture of trust and as a test of Madara’s loyalty. The senior advisors begin to question whether their suspicions of the Uchiha were fueled by Danzō’s misinformation.
Significant themes
- Trust as political leverage: Naruto’s safety becomes a means of testing relations between the Hokage and the Uchiha.
- Peace versus rebellion: Fugaku weighs the risks of an uprising against the clan’s improving life in Konoha.
- Strategic alliances and personal bonds: Madara sees the kindness shown to Naruto as a way to build lasting loyalty.
- Doubt and misinformation: The advisors’ growing uncertainty suggests that long-held prejudices may rest on false intelligence.