"'Glutton's Banquet' had mutated from 'Feast of the Glutton.' There was no essential difference between the two; it was more like a quantitative change, so their exploration distributions should have been the same."
"Since their exploration distributions were the same, it did not matter whether we considered Glutton's Banquet or Feast of the Glutton. Based on that premise, we could ignore Glutton's Banquet and look at Feast of the Glutton alone."
"It was formed through the linkage of 'Helen's Dream' and 'Billa's Sweet Dream.' If we compared it to 'Feast and Banquet,' we would find that this was clearly no longer a mere quantitative change, but a qualitative one."
"Since 'Helen's Dream' and 'Billa's Sweet Dream' constituted the qualitative change we saw now, my first conjecture follows: to reach 100% exploration, 'Helen's Dream' and 'Billa's Sweet Dream' should also have to achieve a perfect 100%."
As Gleipnir spoke, Laplace nodded along in agreement.
Angel felt as though he were listening to a cloud of fog. He understood the evidence behind Gleipnir's earlier deductions, but her logic still seemed to have a break in it. She had probably inserted the results of astrology somewhere in the middle, skipping several steps in the deduction—that was why it felt like there was a gap in her reasoning.
But setting that gap aside, Angel agreed with Gleipnir's final conclusion.
To reach 100% exploration, perhaps Helen's Dream and Billa's Sweet Dream really did need to reach 100% exploration as well.
Still, Angel had some doubts. "But the current special dream is—Glutton's Banquet. In this special dream, how are we supposed to make 'Helen's Dream' and 'Billa's Sweet Dream' reach 100% exploration? They are clearly different dreams."
Gleipnir said, "Though their names make them seem like different special dreams, the places where all three dreams occurred