Alignments mainly refer to what actions you perform to lean toward a certain alignment, rather than dictating that you must do certain things simply because you belong to a particular alignment.
Some readers looked things up online and decided that the standard for Lawful Evil is a specific way.
That is very one-sided.
The representative figures of Lawful Evil are lawyers, tyrants, and devils.
Although lawyers talk about the law, their favorite thing to do is exploit loopholes in the law. Tyrants like to rule others with cruel methods while placing few restrictions on themselves; instead, they often appear arrogant, luxurious, and debauched.
Finally, there are devils.
Devils are the extreme embodiment of Lawful Evil. If other species have an evil score of only 5, then a devil's evil score is 50.
They emphasize discipline and order, ruling through cruel methods.
Yet lower devils are constantly looking for opportunities and plots to exploit loopholes in the order, and then take out their superiors to replace them.
There has been a lot of debate about this lately, and some remarks make me feel not like alignments, but rather like blockheads.
A Paladin of Lawful Good can also fall and do things that look rather evil.
Even the devils of Hell have Albino Erinyes and so on.
Alignment is a broad concept, not a standard to constrain behavior. Even deities can experience alignment shifts due to other influences.
I do not know which guy instilled in you that concept that alignment determines behavior.
However, I want to say that guy is a heretic.
Hehe.
Finally, let me talk about something interesting: Fututu moved back to his hometown, mainly to focus on typing out chapters.
Because this book means a great deal to me, if in the future I truly lack the time