, people are working in Marvel, the system
"The establishment of Avengers, in addition to dealing with the increasingly frequent super villains, is also a force independent of S.H.I.E.L.D.." Mike said.
"What kind of enemy is it?" Rogers squinted his eyes and murmured. He seemed to be talking to himself or asking Mike.
However, no matter how smart you are, you will not be able to get the correct answer if you have insufficient information.
He looked up at Mike, and the meaning was self-evident.
Mike knew Captain America as a trustworthy person. To him, Mike did not hide or be vague and said directly, "Hydra!"
"Hydra!" Captain America was undoubtedly shocked. Because he witnessed the "death" of Red Skull with his own eyes, he thought that Hydra disappeared into the dust of history with the fall of the Communist regime.
Captain Rogers made two mistakes.
First of all, Red Skull is not dead - although this has little to do with the continuation of Hydra.
Secondly, the history of Hydra can be traced back to more than 1,400 years ago. At that time, a powerful Inhuman named "Hive" appeared on the earth. This Inhuman was exiled to a distant unknown planet due to his excessive abilities. The purpose of Hydra is to save or serve Hive, also called "Distant Star Project".
Therefore, Hydra led by Red Skull is just a branch of Hydra, and it is not orthodox.
In fact, Red Skull is neither loyal to the orthodox Hydra nor to the Communist Party. He only cares about his own ambitions.
Even if Red Skull is really dead, the various branches of Hydra are still there. This is a secret organization that is good at breaking into parts, forbearing, and growing silently, and it is difficult to uproot.
Just like their slogan. "Cut off one head and two more will grow".
Of course, there is no need to explain these in detail to Rogers. Mike just illustrates the penetration of Hydra into S.H.I.E.L.D., parasitizing S.H.I.E.L.D., using its flesh and blood as the power for its own growth.
It can be said that Hydra and S.H.I.E.L.D. broke their bones and connected their tendons. What Fury is doing is quietly accumulating strength, secretly transferring and hiding S.H.I.E.L.D.'s assets, and then waiting for Hydra to expose himself before performing a precise operation to completely separate Hydra.
How serious the consequences of failure are, how great the pressure will be. So--Mike has reason to suspect that Fury is not shaving his head, but...
Bald!
You cover up the tragedy of baldness by shaving your head, Nick. Fury, you are truly worthy of it.
Ginger is still spicier.
Look at this "young man" Coulson. The issue of his hairline has been brought up repeatedly, and it's annoying him to death.
Rogers listened very carefully with a serious expression.
But the heartbeat is speeding up.
Hydra, old rival.
A sense of mission arises spontaneously.
If it were anyone else, Mike would probably smile and say, "Brother, don't be like this, it's a bit fake."
But Captain America... there is no doubt that he is such a person: a person of flesh and blood, with pain, troubles, and needs, but he never backs down when he is required to stand up - this is the reason why Captain America has always been a C-position Avengers even though his force is mediocre.
The old and cunning Fury knows that Rogers will eventually come to the bowl on his own, without the need to sell favors or reason.
Highlight a worry.
In comparison, the process of recruiting Stark is like taking care of a giant baby, feeding it when it's hungry and coaxing it when it's hungry.
It's simply devastating.
Fortunately, hard work pays off. The grown-up Stark still needs a beating, but he is surprisingly reliable at critical moments.
"Mike, why don't you join Avengers?" Rogers asked after a long silence.
"To put it simply, I don't like it." Mike said, "First of all, I don't like to be restricted."
Rogers asked, "Including legal restrictions?"
Regarding Rogers's question, Mike did not comment, but asked, "Now, should you abide by the current laws, or the laws from seventy years ago?"
"Of course it's the current law..."
Mike laughed:
"The law now is very different from the law 70 years ago, and some places are even contradictory. It was right then, wrong now - this shows that the law is timely and adaptable to the social environment. It represents the universal values of most people and represents "order". But the law has a lag, that is, it may be wrong at a certain point in time or in a certain scene."
"From the perspective of a law enforcement agency, in order to maintain the dignity of the law, even if it is wrong, it must be enforced first. Correction is a matter later. So the question is, should superheroes abide by the law and sit back and let the mistakes continue to be enforced?"
"I don't know what it was like seventy years ago, but today's American police are defined as law enforcers and punishers who violate the law. Their duties do not include protecting the safety of specific people. In other words, in the field of public security, the American police have a positive obligation to proactively stop danger, and specific to an independent public Citizens, this obligation is only based on the police's independent judgment. In other words, it is your luck if the police rescue you, and it is your life if the police does not rescue you. That's why there is news like "American police shot and killed a citizen who was committing suicide". It sounds absurd, but from a legal perspective, it is completely logical."
"I think that although superheroes are called vigilantes, they should be different from United States police. For example, they should pay more attention to protecting the safety of specific people. I don't like those superheroes who don't kill. The super criminals they don't kill are always in jail → jailbreak, committing crimes → jail again, and so on. The innocent people killed by super criminals during their crimes are supposed to be the citizens that superheroes should protect. Because of their own beliefs and principles, the death of innocent people cannot be said to be the responsibility of superheroes, but in this case, what is the difference between superheroes and those United States police officers whose lives are behind them? Are they more powerful?"
Mike saw Rogers frowning, and then remembered that Captain America also "does not kill", but he is not pedantic.
Mike sighed, "Look, you don't agree with my point of view."
Rogers said, "When you stare into the abyss, the abyss is also staring at you - as the front line of fighting against super criminals, superheroes should stick to the bottom line, and the law is undoubtedly the embodiment of universal values, which serves as the bottom line. At least it can avoid the tragedy of "dragon slayers will eventually become evil dragons"."
Mike shook his head and said, "The most disgusting" is agnosticism. Why can many United States people do evil and be pious at the same time? Because their logic is this: If you kill someone, you must be Hell? Not necessarily - he may be the future Hitler. If you save someone, you will definitely be Going to Heaven? Not necessarily - he may be the future Hitler. Who knows about the future, this is agnosticism. So, believe in God. Believing in God is the only way to be sure that you can go to Heaven. Just be pious, it doesn't matter whether you are crooked or full of five evils."
"I'm not an agnostic. I don't know if I will fall into the abyss and become a dragon because of eliminating evil. What I am sure of is that if these villains don't die, innocent people will definitely die. My logic is that punishing evil means promoting good. Saving one life is better than building a seven-level pagoda. Moreover, I will not bear all the responsibility on myself."