Ch. 122Without a factual basis, relying on personal subjective judg-
During Wang Mingxuan’s appeal hearing, Su Bai challenged the prosecution’s claim that Wang had foreseen Lin Xiu jumping from his vehicle, and the presiding judge found no compelling evidence for that claim. The hearing recessed while the judges deliberated, leaving the panel divided over whether Wang should be convicted.
- Su Bai objected when Lü Hongmei argued that Wang Mingxuan had foreseen Lin Xiu jumping, demanding evidence rather than subjective inference.
- Jiang Hetao identified the dispute as whether Wang had known or foreseen Lin Xiu would jump, then questioned Wang, who said he slowed down to warn her and called emergency services after she jumped.
- The court recessed for an hour, and Lü Hongmei told Xu Qing that she expected the prosecution to make its case in court statements.
- In the deliberation room, Feng Qian argued for conviction based on the outcome and public opinion, while Zhang Yingying insisted that guilt required legal grounds and evidence.
- Jiang Hetao stopped their argument and asked Feng Qian and Zhang Yingying to review the evidence and both sides’ statements again.