The weak had no right to act wild before the strong.
Much less did they have the right to question the strong.
After all, even laws were merely shackles created by one group of people to better rule another. If life were truly equal, "no one may deprive others of their lives" would not be empty words. Therefore, no matter how grandly reality dressed up the law, it remained a sharp weapon for judging life and death. This was the one reality no one could deny.
So, to put it more vividly—
The law was a sword.
The purpose for which this sword was forged was slaughter.
The only difference was who it killed.
Ultimately, the one who decided who this sword killed was the person holding it. And since it was people who decided whom to kill, there were bound to be unjust souls beneath its blade. The wrongful convictions throughout history proved this well enough. After all, the sword itself had no autonomy. The wielder was the true murderer, while the original smith was the accomplice. Such was this excessively cruel world, opposed to conscience.
Looking at it from another angle—
Whether in the Myriad Heavens or the Lesser Thousand Worlds,
Or in other worlds,
No mainstream ideology could avoid peace and kindness.
So think about it in reverse. If this world had not taken Survival of the Fittest to the extreme, if conflict and cruelty had not reached their limits, why would people keep deliberately emphasizing those two useless words?
What was emphasized was always the opposite reality.
What went unmentioned was what was normal.
This was a mainstream line of thought in philosophy-centered thinking.
Therefore, under the premise of Survival of the Fittest,
After the two Supremes had each been knocked unconscious by a single strike,